Google Authorship: Are Top Social Media Influencers Using It?

Print Friendly

Google-Authorship-Are-Top-Social-Media-Influencers-Using-It-V3 copy

As excited as I have been about the rise of Google Plus, I’ve been even more pumped about a Google feature intimately tied in to Google’s social network: Google Authorship. Authorship was rolled out about the same time as Google+ last year. It allows content creators to connect their blog posts, articles, videos, and other content to their Google+ profiles. In return Google may feature their content with a “rich snippet” result that displays their profile photo next to search results for their content (see the example for Windmill Networking head Neal Schaefer at right).

But the greatest promise of Google Authorship is probably yet to come: Author Rank (sometimes written as “AuthorRank” in homage to Google’s signature PageRank algorithm). From the very introduction of Authorship, Google staffers have said that “at some point” it will be used as a ranking signal in Google search. According to Google patents researched by the incomparable Bill Slawski, Google has wanted for some time to be able to connect verified authors with their content and then rank them topically for it. Google+ provided the one missing piece in that scheme, as now a large number of people have incentive to set up a profile with Google. Anyone who has a Google+ profile can now tell Google where they produce original content. Even though Googlers say that Author Rank is not yet in use, Google is collecting data on all connected authors that will some day be used as a ranking factor.

Like Google+ itself, Google Authorship got off to a slow start as far as adoption by users. In part that may have been because the original method for a verified connection was fairly complicated. But now Google has come up with a number of easier methods to connect Authorship, it seems to be gaining momentum.  A search for “Google Authorship” on Google Trends shows that search volume for that term has taken off in the past few months.

So something like this must be a “no-brainer” for highly influential people in social media, right? Not necessarily…

Study of Forbes Top 50 Most Influential in Social Media

Earlier this year Forbes magazine published a much-referenced list of the Top 50 Social Media Influencers. The list is based on ratings from the PeekYou index, including only people who produce their own content and whose following appears to be at least 50% real people. I thought this list would serve as a good sampling for a study of the adoption rate of Google Authorship by those obviously adept at building networks on social media. In other words, how many of these social media influentials understand the potential value of Google Authorship to the extent that they have intentionally set up a Google+ profile and connected it to their content?

For this study, I sought out the main content site (if one existed) of each person named in the Forbes list. In a few cases the person did not appear to create any online content that I could find other than their social media posts. I then chose a recent post and ran it through Google’s Structured Data Testing Tool (formerly the Rich Snippets Testing Tool). Among other uses, this tool shows whether Google sees the content as having a verified Authorship link with a Google+ profile. If the tool did not show the person has verified authorship, I did some Google searches (in Chrome incognito mode to nullify personalized results as much as possible) for their content to see if they were getting the Authorship rich snippet result (author photo with search result) anyway. Since about September 2012 we’ve noticed that Google will give some popular authors a rich snippet result even if they have not connected intentionally to Authorship.

Results: Google Authorship Adoption Among Social Media Influentials

Adoption of Google Authorship among these highly-influential people on social media was surprisingly low. Only 15 of the 50 influentials (30%) have set up an Authorship connection. Another 17 (34%) not implementing Authorship get the rich snippet author result anyway.

In fact, the top six names on the list do not use Authorship, though all but one get the automatic rich snippet result in search. It’s also interesting to note that 10% of these folks appear to produce content only on social networks; they have no blog or articles online under their own names that I could find.

Here’s a Google Docs spreadsheet with the entire list and my results.

Why Low Adoption of Google Authorship?

While this is only one list of social media influentials, I would assume that it would be pretty typical of results for any such list. But why should there be such low adoption (less than a third) by supposedly influence- and network-savvy professionals? Actually, a survey by Barry Schwartz of well-known tech bloggers found an even more abysmal adoption rate: 9%. Why aren’t such people jumping on this opportunity?

I can only speculate, but here are a few reasons I’ve encountered when talking with “should-know-better” friends, the kind of people who are usually early adopters of such things, but who haven’t signed on to Authorship yet:

  • Implementation is too hard
  • They don’t want (or feel they don’t need) a Google+ profile.
  • They are reluctant to give too much information to Google.
  • They don’t see Authorship as being very important or influential.
  • They simply don’t know about (or don’t know enough about) the Authorship program.

Any of those (or more I haven’t heard or thought of) may be in play, but let me add one more that I think may be the reason in all too many cases: most social media experts have little knowledge of or experience with SEO (Search Engine Optimization).

I have had the advantage (at least I consider it one!) of earning my wings in social media marketing in an SEO agency. Because of that, I understand the crucial importance of ranking well in search engines. While engaging on social media is great for spreading your influence, increasing brand awareness, monitoring brand sentiment, serving existing customers, and many other uses, search is where a business can connect with buyers at what Google calls “the Zero Moment of Truth,” that point in the chain of a purchase decision where the prospect is ready to buy. In addition, search is one of the best places to be discovered by people who never heard of your or your business before.

Armed with that knowledge, my passion has become pursuing the intersection of search and social media. In particular, I want to know how social media influences search. To my way of thinking, social media used properly allows one to obtain a double advantage: direct influence (in the social networks themselves) and expanded influence (in better search rankings).

So when Google puts something right in front of me and says, “Here’s a free, legitimate way for you to do better in search,” you can bet I pay attention. But I think a lot of social media marketers who have no background in SEO have little or no idea of how important is, nor do they seem very aware of ways their social activity could give them a boost in that arena. So when something like Google Authorship comes along, they yawn and go back to their Twitter feed.

Why Should Social Media Marketers Be Google Authors?

Anyone paying attention in the online marketing world these days should be aware that we are in the age of content. Google’s Panda and Penguin algorithm updates have made gaming the system with worthless spammy sites and link buying schemes much less effective. Now more than ever the major search engines are hungry to reward and promote great content that leaves users glad they used the search engine.

With Authorship, Google has made the next major step forward in surfacing worthwhile content. Authorship recognizes that good content is produced by real people, and that a person who has created content that people like in the past is likely to keep doing so in the future. Even before Author Rank is fully enabled, Authorship is already helping people get connected with more content from authors they like. For example, the rich snippet search result includes: 1) a byline (personal branding!) that links to your Google+ profile, 2) the number of people who have circled you on Google+ (trust mark), and 3) a link to pages of search results of your related content.


Google Author Rich Snippet Search Result

In addition, now if you click on an Authorship search result, spend at least a minute viewing the linked content, and then click your browser’s back button to return to search, the original result expands to show links to more of your content related to the search query:


Google Authorship Expanded Search Result

Rich snippet results like these are proven to increase click-through rates on your search results up to 30%.

Earlier in the post I said that we are in the age of content, but I think that trend is already being overshadowed by the power of the personal brand. People naturally trust other people, especially people they view as “authoritative,” over faceless brands. Because searchers tend to do repeated searches within their narrow fields of interest, if you are an authoritative content creator in that field and are using Google Authorship, those searchers will actually get to know your face and be drawn to it. I have personal proof of this. Recently I was at a major conference moving between sessions through the lobby when a stranger stopped   me and stared at me curiously for a moment. Then he suddenly exclaimed, “I’ve got it! I knew I knew you. I’ve seen you in my search results!”

And of course, as I mentioned earlier, Google has stated repeatedly that they intend at some point to begin to use data collected about connected authors as a factor in search rankings (Author Rank). Even if that isn’t a factor yet (and personally, I think they are at least testing it), they are collecting the data that will build that ranking power right now, which is why you need to be using Authorship today!

So anyone creating content has an incentive to connect their content to their Google+ profile. But I believe social media marketers are in a unique position to take advantage of Google Authorship and Author Rank better than many others.

Why? Because if we go by the many Google patents that appear to be the basis of Author Rank, social signals will be the major determinant of Author Rank. Google says they will watch how much and what kind of engagement your content about specific topics gets. While some of that will be onsite engagement (such as blog comments), much of it will take place in the social sphere. Google is observing how people share, comment on, +1, retweet, and link to your content as it is shared across social media.

More important than how many engage with your content on social media, though, is who engages with it. Google will count engagement by someone else who is considered authoritative in your posts’ topic (or a closely related topic) as a stronger vote for it than such from an average reader. That means that the social networks you’re building, and particularly the real relationships you’re establishing with influential people in your market, are even more important than you thought.

And all this also means that there is no more important social network on which you can be building that network now than Google+. Since Google+ is a part of Google, Google can see everything that happens there much more easily than they can from other social networks. Google+ public posts get quickly indexed by Google search, and I’ve seen many of my posts there become and stay high ranking for important keywords for months. Moreover, Google can see my entire network on Google+. They know who has circled me (and what circle names they’ve put me in). They know how much engagement I get from other authoritative users. So I’m convinced that nothing else I do has more effect on my Author Rank than my use of Google+.

How to Take Advantage of Google Authorship as a Social Media Marketer

I’ll conclude with some practical tips on how you can put Google Authorship to use, and put yourself in good position for the full implementation of Author Rank.

  • Set up a well-optimized Google+ profile (as complete as possible, with a clear face shot for your profile photo and your main keywords in the Introduction section).
  • Intentionally connect every place on the web where you post original content to your Google+ profile. I have complete instructions here for all the different methods.
  • Link to all your other social media profiles from your Google+ profile.
  • Connect your personal YouTube channel to your Google+ profile. You do this by accepting the invitation to “change your YouTube name to your Google+ name” when you log in to YouTube.
  • Begin building a network of active, relevant Google+ users related to your main fields. My posts here on Windmill Networking will help you do that.
  • Become a valuable contributor to that network, as well as your networks on other social sites. Balance sharing your own content with re-sharing and engaging with that of others.
  • Learn how to do effective keyword research and traffic analysis for your own content sites, and use that as the basis for creating more authoritative content on the things your audience seems to appreciate most.

While it’s sad that only a minority of very influential people on social media have taken advantage of Google Authorship so far, that also means you and I have a great opportunity here to get a jump up. Early adoption is a significant factor in rising high in any new social venture. One reason a “nobody” like me now has over 26,000 Google+ followers is that I was invited in on the network’s third day. Of course, I’ve also worked very hard at it. The point is that Google seems serious about Authorship, and those who are building an authoritative author profile today will be ahead of their competition as it is brought more into play in search results in the near (we hope!) future.

Mark Traphagen
This monthly Google Plus column is contributed by Mark Traphagen. Mark is Director of Social Media Marketing for Virante. A former teacher, Mark has worked directly in Internet marketing since 2005, but has been involved in social media and online community formation since the mid 1990s. When not helping Virante clients improve their online presence, Mark participates in competitive storytelling, plays with a Dixieland street band, and (surprise) spends more time on the web. +Mark Traphagen
Mark Traphagen


Klout Top 10 Expert for SEO & Content Marketing | Speaker on Power of the Personal | Sr. Director of Online Marketing -
My fitbit #Fitstats_en_US for 8/29/2015: 5,993 steps and 2.6 miles traveled. - 9 hours ago
Mark Traphagen


    • says

      Hi Mark!
      Great article, and extremely inspiring.
      For years I have been working in annonymity behind various user names, and ghost writing content. Your article has inspired me to perhaps connect some of my writing to my personal Google + and join Google Authorship.
      What advice would you have for ghost writers?

      • says

        Hi Suzanne, glad you enjoyed the article!

        I don’t know how to advise you on ghost writing, since Google Authorship is all about connecting real people to their content. If you want to build personal “credit” with Google for what you’re producing, it will need to be under the same name as your Google+ profile.

    • says

      Google keeps treasures like that too well hidden. That’s one more reason we all need to be helping each other out and sharing resources as we find them. Glad to be of help, Ian!

  1. says

    Whew! This is making my head hurt, but it’s extremely interesting. I do wonder how it will all pan out. For most of us who did not cut our teeth in the digital world, trying to be everywhere and optimize every opportunity is exhausting!

    • says

      It can be indeed, Claire! You really have to think about your priorities, especially where you think your audience is, and where you can get the most bang (i.e., reach and influence) for your time. Google Authorship seems like a no-brainer to me, though, because setup is relatively easy now, and the benefits just keep flowing after that. The only thing you need to remember to do ongoingly is to link from any new place where you are publishing content under your name to your G+ profile, and link back to that place from the Contributor To section of your profile. And if you’re active on social media, be sure to link all your social media profiles in the “Other Profiles” section so Google knows how much influence you have!

  2. says

    Mark – thanks so much for this article. I had set up my authorship months ago when it was first announced by Google. However, looks like I never verified my email and so was never getting the full benefits (doi!).

    After reading this post tonight I verified and it seems to be working.

    You research is interesting. The numbers both surprise me and don’t surprise me at the same time. I would have expected the number to be higher. However, I agree with your assumptions as to why folks have not implemented. I think it’s probably a combo of all of the above 😉

    Anyway, just wanted to give you a big thanks for inspiring me to do the double click on this tonight.

    Hope your New Year is kicking off great!

  3. says

    Mark – one more question I have for you is how did you verify if it was an auto authorship or not? You have mine listed as an auto authorship. However, I did manually setup the authorship but believe it was not showing accurately since I had not successfully verified. Interested to know how this showed different and the method you used to verify.

    Again – thanks for your work on this! :)

    • says

      Hi Pam! Thanks for your kind words in your previous comment, and glad I inspired you to get verified!

      By “auto authorship” I meant that in a non-logged-in-to-Google (non-personalized) Google search for your content, Google was showing an authorship snippet for you, even though you hadn’t (yet) verified authorship. As I said in the article, for some time now Google has been giving the rich snippet result to many high-profile authors if they think they can make a reasonable connection between content and a G+ profile. But I still recommend doing full verification as a best practice. When AuthorRank really kicks in, I wouldn’t want to take chances missing out on its full benefits!

      Thanks for the question, and thanks for all you bring to the online marketing world. I follow you online and benefit from your work often.

  4. says

    Hi Mark, thanks for the top article – extremely in depth on some of the big questions of authorship implementation. Like you I’m amazed at the low uptake rate… but as you say when you’ve been an SEO you actually appreciate the value of search – most people don’t (Though you’d think a single comparison of a bing vs google search would make people realise just how important search is!

  5. says

    The answer for some of us is simple. We don’t trust Google. They have made it clear that their intention is to favor big brands (which they clearly do) and limit what people can find (also proven). They have been quoted as saying their vision is to return only ONE result for any search.

    Why volunteer to make it easier for them to track everything you do by using gmail or make everything you write disappear at once by using authorship? Yes, they can still track everything and still find everything – but if they want to do evil let’s not make it easier for them.

    Personally, I prefer to be able to find ALL views about any subject – not just the two polarized views those who control the major media and everything else present. I have no desire to have someone else decide for me what it is I want to think, see, or read.

    • says

      Thanks for your feedback, Gail.

      I understand your feelings about trusting a large corporation, though your feelings about it are certainly more passionate than mine!

      Feelings aside, my view is that we have to work with the tools we have. And I don’t work from the assumption that Google intends to “do evil” to me. We may have to agree to disagree on that.

      What it comes down to though is whether or not it is important to you for your content to be found online. If it is, then Google is the main game. Depending on whose figures you use and what part of the world you’re talking about, 60-80% of the searches done online are done on Google.

      You say you want to see ALL information on any subject. But how can you possible do that? Do you walk into a library and check out all the books? Of course not. You rely on a number of curation devices to get to what will probably be best, from the librarians selections for that library to book reviews to bestseller lists, etc. There is no such thing as “give me all the information.” Everything is curated.

      In my view, Authorship is the exact opposite of what you make it. It is the further democratization of search results. If someone becomes an authoritative author, it is because “the people have spoken” through their social interactions that say, “This writer is the best on this topic.” How could it be more fair than that. Google doesn’t choose your search results. “Votes” in the form of authoritative links from other people’s sites do. And Authorship humanizes that even more, as it moves toward real people “voting” for what should rank highest, not some Mighty Controlling Dictator.

      • says

        Hi Mark,

        Thank you for replying. For 5.5 years I managed AdWords accounts and seeing what Google was doing there is why I don’t trust them. I’ve been compiling issues with what Google does and writing about them for years now. If you are open to learning why I consider them the most dangerous entity to our personal freedoms including freedom of choice you can start with the post at

        When I say I want ALL the information what I should more accurately have said is that I want to read alternative viewpoints. I do not want to have everything pre-filtered for me so that all I see is the party line closest to the profile Google thinks is who I am.

        If you realized how much “personalization” is going on in search results – and even worse – how social proof is being manipulated to control public opinion – you could better understand my point of view.

        A good place to see this is by looking at content on major sites related to vaccinations or creationism versus evolution. Go to CNN posts about the flu and the majority of comments are from people totally convinced that vaccinations work. Many of them are even in favor of forcing everyone to take them. I was quite surprised that comments in a similar story on Yahoo! News were primarily anti-vaccination.

        While some of that is due to people reading what agrees with their belief systems, much of it is manipulated. The most obvious example I’ve seen of that was on Hulu. Although the movie The Case for Christ had 300+ comments which were almost all positive about the movie, on the first page of comments 8 out of 10 were negative.

        Originally that movie could easily be found on Hulu when you searched for it. Later it did NOT show up in search results on the site itself, but you could find it using a search engine. Shortly thereafter, all the original comments were deleted and there were only a handful of new comments.

        What is happening is that alternative points of view are being pushed down in the results and the two polarized mainstream belief positions promoted. For now, you can still find other viewpoints IF you dig really deep into the results – often as deep as 20+ pages – but off and on I’m seeing Google show only ten pages of results. I just screen captured a search yesterday to post about that because you can only get to the first ten pages even though it says clearly there are 450,000+ results returned.

        This does not surprise me. Google’s CEO made it quite clear that they intended to “clean up” the Internet “cesspool” by favoring big brands (the quote about that is on SEOBook – I can provide the link if it doesn’t turn up in search – wasn’t sure more than one link in a comment would work).

        Might they not also want to “clean up” whatever does not conform to the beliefs they want us to have? I believe that IS their plan and I have seen clear evidence of it. I wrote a post about Food Rights and it took me three times longer than it should have to find supporting documentation even though I was searching for both the question AND the answer I wanted to find. When the results are limited to 10 pages I won’t be able to find them at all.

        I agree that everything is curated, but originally most libraries and bookstores would stock what people wanted to read – not only what the person in power permits. We are moving toward a situation where it will be easy to control what is available and literally rewrite history on the fly. Amazon already reached out and deleted books from Kindles that people had paid for – and that they did this to copies of 1984 and other “subversive” books made that all the more obvious. What if they instead “edit” digital copies of books? How many would notice? (Very few!) Do we really want to allow Google to “curate” free speech?

        Yes, they have a monopoly. Yes, for many sites 65% to as high as 98% of their traffic comes directly from Google. I consider that a serious threat to their survival and our freedom of choice – and one we as bloggers can reverse. All we have to do is encourage people to move away from handing Google all our time and attention instead of toward giving them even more of it.

        We need to be saving links (because later we won’t be able to find them in search engines.) We should be making connections with people and taking those discussions to places that are under OUR control – not theirs.

  6. says

    I think it was brilliant while it lasted, we all learnt the value of ‘getting the click’ when we were on the first page of Google. We all made our images circular to get the best click and we were all smiling! At least for SEO results anyway – onwards!

Please Leave a Comment!